Board Thread:Administrator's Noticeboard/@comment-7697305-20150120234008/@comment-22434585-20150208040714

TerrariamcSwaggins wrote: Refer to this post for the out-of-context counter-claims. You don't consider some of the points brought up against your improvements vs. the unified nominations page, but rather dismiss them by saying, "Again, I'm speaking of improvements to the current system." and such. To reiterate, this is a debate between your proposed improvements to the system and the proposed overhaul below (not sure if Forze and I are still on the same page, here).

When I said above, "...wrong context this entire time, then.", I was incorrect. It was just the post that I linked above that was using incorrect context in regards to the debate, I believe. My apologies.

Please state what I haven't been returning? There's a good chance I haven't returned them because you're reading my replies wrong, or not understanding something (or vice versa).