Talk:Golden Shower

Anyone know how much defense this drops? From what I've seen, it's somewhere from 10 to 20 defense, since I've seen it deal 5-10 more damage from the second hit onwards.

Sex Act: I'm not exactly sure that the description for the golden shower being a sex act should be publicly stated, although a true piece of trivia, and most likely correct, It's somewhat inappropriate for some audiences to read outright (aka the children). I think it's safe to say that most people will know what a Golden Shower is, and it does not need to be explained for the naive.
 * It's called the Golden Rain. Golden Shower is a book in this game, all right, dude.

- I think information should not be withheld, however. It could be written down on a more euphemic way, so as not to be too vulgar. Also, I think the existing trivia about Ichor should be moved to the Ichor page.


 * Done, and done. The trivia about Ichor has been moved to the Ichor page, and the Golden Shower's trivia has been rewritten to be a little less blunt.

Is the "Highest DPS" part an old addition? Weapons like the Blizzard Staff, Razorpine and Bubble Gun have long outclassed this weapon. Should it be removed as it is now outdated, even with the Ichor effect?

Team Fortress trivia
Regarding this edit currently being fought over: Trivia like this tends to be removed since there's no evidence that one necessarily came from the other. This isn't so original as to warrant assuming one must have gotten the idea from the other. I would say both Terraria and Team Fortress are referencing the age-old concept of throwing pee on one's enemies. You could say Team Fortress is merely another game that features a pee weapon, but to say that one references the other is just not something we can really back up.

...and here are more: this, this, this, this.  Equazcion ( talk ) 12:21, 8 Sep 2014 (UTC)


 * But unlike all the other times, where peeing is a taunt, Golden Showers and Jarate both cause a debuff, where the afflicted opponent takes more damage from other weapons. Personally, I think it's specific enough to warrant a trivia mention. FyreNWater (talk) 19:51, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Jarate is a bomb pretty much, and is thrown once, and isnt a stream at all, also the Golden Shower isnt the only thing that inflicts Ichor, theres also the Flask of Ichor, Ichor Bullet and Ichor Arrow. Would you say those are a refrence to it? Also I doubt that Redigit would look at TF2, see the jarate and say, "You know what would be the same?, the blood of gods.", also Ichor is a defence reducing debuff, its not necessarilly more damage, it just makes the enemy loose defence. Whereas Jarate makes enemies always take mini-crits. Now if Ichor weapons made you more likely to critical hit targets then I would see a refrence., but it does not. WelchDrew (talk) 19:56, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Then a trivia mention of Jarate in the Ichor page, maybe/maybe not on individual ichor weapons. Good? FyreNWater (talk) 19:57, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Without the "could be a reference" part, in my opinion. Maybe just say there's a similar weapon in TF2.  Equazcion ( talk ) 23:30, 11 Sep 2014 (UTC)

Since this goofy little debate seems to be experiencing a flareup lately, I'll put forth the case that the trivia note regarding the "potential reference" is totally unnecessary. Historically, ichor is a golden liquid, which eventually came to be known as an unpleasant fluid associated with disease and infection. Only the Golden Shower's name references its similarity to piss, and it does so in a manner entirely dissimilar to throwing a jar of old urine. You could just as easily say that a Molotov Cocktail is a reference, seeing as it's actually a jar of yellow fluid (specifically the Ale used to craft it) thrown as an unconventional weapon to inflict a debuff with a fixed duration. Master Bait and Mourning Wood are proof that TF2 hardly has a monopoly on juvenile bodily humor, and considering that Mario and Link's clothes are in the game and all but outright stated to be items from other franchises, I think that a reference would be much more obvious. People are trying far too hard to speculate on connections that are normally just laid out for them. 98.196.175.207 15:04, 2 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Damn, I added this in for a bit of fun months ago, only to see it now caused such a massive controversy, like I fucking murdered someone and it needs to be covered up. What the hell is wrong with you children? Seriously, I am in disbelief. Grow the hell up and let trivia be just that, trivia. If you're going to be that fucking serious over a playful little detail, then just bloody remove trivia altogether. Very disappointed with the idiots that "run" this. Shape up. (Anonymous, 22:27, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * If it were just you and this one edit, it's likely nobody would've cared. The problem is, if we left in all these little items people added just for fun, most articles would be double the size. That's why this has become an issue -- not really your particular edit alone, but the general attempt to develop and somewhat enforce a standard for deciding which trivia items stay and which get removed.  Equazcion ( talk ) 06:37, 10 Nov 2014 (UTC)