User blog comment:Mathmagician/Project - Individual Pages/@comment-1863391-20120110041936/@comment-4674838-20120110050015

I talked to him on the chat earlier. If I was understanding him correctly, he was of the opinion that disambiguation pages shouldn't contain any descriptions at all. That they should ONLY say something like "Repeaters may refer to:" followed by the links. In other words, he felt that content pages were preferable to disambiguations.

I personally think that the description was very, very minimal, and repeaters is something that many people would search for, so it makes sense to have a disambiguation. If there was more content (full paragraph, multiple paragraphs, images, templates, etc.) then I would make it a content page. In any case, I'd say just leaving it is a good call. The important part of this project isn't whether a disambig template is there or not. It's most important to just make sure that information is separated appropriately.

In other words, while I feel it should have remained a disambig, I'm not willing to change it right at the moment. I'd say this issue can be revisited later. Maybe Gracey can clear it up. Disambig pages often do have a brief description, such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_(disambiguation)