Board Thread:Administrator's Noticeboard/@comment-7697305-20140527012127/@comment-24133975-20140528184919

Kida155 wrote:

TerrariamcSwaggins wrote:

Kida155 wrote:

TerrariamcSwaggins wrote: it would just be better if we could get the filter up and running. This is subjective. As displayed by multiple posts above, there is obvious disagreement over this filter. There is also multiple posts proving disagreement to be invalid. Disagreement is not "invalid", opinions CANNOT be valid/invalid. They are not facts. Just because you think it's a grand idea doesn't mean those who disagree are automatically counted as "invalid". And here I was, expecting a mature discussion about this.

There is nothing immature about this discussion. I was merely stating that those arguments, or statements, were, in a sense, proved wrong by a series of carefully thought through points. Sure, they were good points, but they were still out-weighed by the points that were brought up against them. You're right, just because I think it's a good idea doesn't make all the arguments brought up against it automatically "invalid", considering that, that's why I have been carefully replying to those who disagree attempting to show them that my point of view on the issue may be better then theirs.