Talk:Mimic/@comment-77.231.171.128-20111213113521/@comment-4658608-20111213155224

A wiki is a reservoir of information. What is enough? Do we limit information in order to govern what people have access to? People come to a wiki looking for different things, which share a common theme: answers to the unknown. I'm not meaning to be existential here, but essentially, a source of information is only complete when all relevant details have been defined and cataloged. Considering the human capacity for questioning is not finite, this means the job is theoretically impossible. In order to simplify this, the answer to "What is enough?" is generally, the amount of information needed to answer the majority of questions." If you wanted to get very specific, we could talk about six sigma and standard deviation, but that's not really necessary.

If there are questions that remain unanswered, information should be gathered in an attempt to answer those questions. That is the purpose of a wiki. So no, to answer your question, your solution is *not* enough. As to the other, this should not require explaining, but no, it's not difficult to grasp what a mimic is. It is difficult to understand in what way they interact with the interface of the game. Which is what the gathering of information seeks to resolve.

So let me ask you, why are you so against adding information?