Talk:Minishark

Ammunition
"The Minishark is a machine gun that can be bought from the Arms Dealer and uses any form of ammunition." Does ammunition mean only the three items on that page - i.e., bullets - or does it include seeds, arrows, sand, or stars? Perhaps a different word - "bullets" - should be used, since seeds and arrows clearly also fit the dictionary definition of "ammunition". --Einstein9073 19:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah that always bothered me. It's based on the fact that the Ammunition page always only listed bullets, until recently (when I added notes about other ammunition types there). The Ammo slots hold arrows too, and I assume seeds. The Ammunition page could use a redesign, and then the gun pages should be tweaked accordingly.  Equazcion ( talk ) 19:12, 19 Aug 2011 (UTC)

Ammo consumption
"The Minishark's special ability makes it so that it will averagely shoot about 333 (250*133%)..." Erm, isn't it supposed to be a 33% chance of not using ammo? Because that would be 375 rounds (250*150%), not 333 rounds. Woden 01:14, 15 August 2011 (UTC) (I suck at Wiki formatting. :
 * Yes, it's a 33% chance of not using ammo. No, it's not 375 rounds. I'm not sure where you even got that number from. Actually, there's probably something I'm missing... Math, how does it work? --Lunboks 01:24, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 150% would be the equation if there were a 50% chance of not consuming ammo.
 * In other words: One third of the 250-count stack will not be consumed on average, which equals 83 shots rounded. 250 (actual stack) + 83 average gain = 333.
 * Your way, 375 shots from a 250-count stack would be a 125 shot gain, which is half the actual stack of 250, a 50% gain.  Equazcion ( talk ) 01:27, 15 Aug 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, probably should have explained this better. It's based on reciprocals (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplicative_inverse). A 33% reduction means that you are using 2/3rds as much ammo, and to figure out how much ammo you would effectively have, you use the reciprocal of that, 3/2 (150%). (2/3) * (3/2) = 1, which is why you use that rather than 4/3 (133%). It helps if you keep in mind doubling and halving: if you double a number (2/1), then you need to halve (1/2) it to get back to the original number ( (1/2) * (2/1) = 1). Woden 02:14, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, probably should have explained this better. It's based on reciprocals (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplicative_inverse). A 33% reduction means that you are using 2/3rds as much ammo, and to figure out how much ammo you would effectively have, you use the reciprocal of that, 3/2 (150%). (2/3) * (3/2) = 1, which is why you use that rather than 4/3 (133%). It helps if you keep in mind doubling and halving: if you double a number (2/1), then you need to halve (1/2) it to get back to the original number ( (1/2) * (2/1) = 1). Woden 02:14, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

ok there is a huge confusion due to math. i can see an additive percentage gain or (two) multiplicative percentages. 1/3 + 1/5 = 5/15 + 3/15 = 8/15 = .53 (repeating 3's) = 153% (computers love dropping final numbers' digits). 1.33 * 1.2 = 1.596 = 160% (rounded up) OR  4/3 * 1.2 [basically 1/5 already done] = 1.6 = 160%. any questions? i personally think it is the later equation due to my experiences with games' percentages with math. 96.13.59.60 03:50, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The source code uses fractions rather than percents. The statement for deciding a random occurrence looks something like "if rand(10) = true then...", meaning "pick a random number from 1 to 10, and if that number equals 1, do ..." Stacked randoms (though I haven't looked at those yet) probably look like "if rand(10) or rand(3) then..." My math skills aren't awesome so I wouldn't know exactly how to calculate a percent that totals the two chances.  Equazcion ( talk ) 03:58, 15 Aug 2011 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify the math:
 * You safe about 83 shots while firing the first 250 shots
 * After that you save 28 shots while firing the 83 shots
 * After that you save 9 shots while firing the 28 shots
 * After that you save 3 shots while firing the 9 shots
 * After that you save 1 shots while firing the 3 shots


 * Disregarding rounding this sums up to about 375 shots.--DoubleFloat 18:11, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah looks like I was wrong there, Woden seems to have had a good point, though I don't know where he got 150% from even though that does work out to the correct answer.  Equazcion ( talk ) 18:39, 15 Aug 2011 (UTC)
 * You get 150% by dividing available quantity by usage rate (on average, you use 2/3's of a shot per shot), so you'd have 250 / (2/3) = 250 * 1.5 which is where he gets the 150% from. --JonTheMon 18:45, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

DPS and fire rate
How many shots can the Minishark fire within one second, and how much damage would it do to a hypothetical enemy with 1000 HP and no defense within 1 second assuming all shots hit and the ammunition is Musket Balls? --Deltalon 13:38, 15 November 2011 (UTC)


 * The use time of the Minishark is 7 frames per shot. Using conventional ammunition, the damage inflicted is 6 + 7 == 13. At 13 damage per shot, this comes out to about 112 damage max per second. 68.203.239.250 22:49, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * try with a "rapid" modifier for a -1 use time. it'll then be 13 / (6/60) = 130 67.233.98.19 00:46, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Modifiers incorrect
This article states that the weapon cannot be reforged with a modifier that gives it knockback.
 * Just to confirm: was it reforged through the Tinkerer or through some other means? It doesn't make sense that it could receive this modifier naturally- 115% of zero is still zero. Gearzein (talk) 09:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

It was reforged through the Tinkerer. I didn't obtain it through any sort of editor. User 489532 (talk) 07:42, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Odd, but I'll believe it. I've edited the page accordingly. Gearzein (talk) 02:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Deadly Modifier is better?
As I compared Deadly with Demonic I found this: (without other bonus and I reforged them in-game)
 * Deadly: 17% Damage, 10% Speed, Approximately 110 DPS (SAME AS MEGASHARK'S 6 USE TIME!!!1!1111)
 * Demonic: 17% Damage, 5% Crit chance, Approximately 100 DPS
 * Huh?
 * Also, Rapid and Hasty also add 17% Speed and some Velocity boost.
 * However, I think velocity is not as important as DPS right?
 * PS. I re-test it and Deadly now only has little difference with DemonicMightyDirtKing (talk) 08:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Best Modifier changed on Desktop 1.4.0.5?
As of Desktop 1.4.0.5 there is now only one Deadly modifier on ranged weapons. As the one that remains affects knockback, that means it should no longer be possible to get it on the Minishark. That would make the best modifier on Desktop Demonic. I've given it a few hundred reforges and not had Deadly come up once, so that seems correct. Could someone else confirm? Metalax (talk) 16:10, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Yep. Was just searching for somewhere I could say this. Minishark can no longer acquire the "Deadly" modifier without mods/generation tools/servers. This means demonic is now the best modifier. I attempted to edit this directly onto the wiki page but realized that the best modifier for any weapon is generated with a preset term, and I don't really understand how that works yet, so if someone else could please change that that'd be great. Though, deadly should still be the best modifier for minishark on console/mobile/old gen console, so we should incorporate that into the page. DyspraxicShade (talk) 07:50, 31 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Changed it, thanks for noting! --Rye Greenwood (talk) 02:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)