Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25532617-20141013053613/@comment-24133975-20141228032533

XxLegoTadhgxX wrote: Swaggins it gets VERY annoying when people consistantly go with false info and not the corect stuff... That doesn't give you an accuse to abuse caps and be rude, though. I can understand that it can be annoying, but explaining yourself in a calm fashion, or even asking him to check for himself, would likely be preferable.

XxLegoTadhgxX wrote: ...also i use console most so dont pull the pc card here, your argument is invalid. Please use a better choice of words. I've learned from experience that saying, "your argument is invalid", never ends well. It appears that DHG did the mature thing by apologizing and conceding, so I really don't see the need to carry on with arguing about something that's already be resolved.

DHG MooKai297 wrote: ...on why vanity shouldn't be consider armor, and thereby puts your argument invalid. Like I said above, saying that one's argument is invalid typically doesn't end well, so it'd probably be best to avoid that choice of words in the future.

DHG MooKai297 wrote: Now, could we PLEASE just drop this stupid debate like Swaggins asked and get back on topic? I'm inclined to agree. So let's just let this argument go, alright, Tad? To clarify completely, placing vanity items into the armor slots is indeed possible, but is usually discouraged as you don't get much as far as stats go with them.

All that said, let's please get back on topic now. Thanks!