Template talk:SpeedMove

I am not sure I see the purpose for this. If an article is improperly named, it should be moved. I don't see a large need for discussion. -- Wynthyst  talk  23:09, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that it causes conflict if it is moved without discussion as I have seen on previous wikis. There doesn't need to be a huge discussion but as long as people agree then I feel that is alright. The notice gets people involved and if it truly does need to be moved then yes, it can be moved easily. This is only a precaution as what I'm use to seeing. -- Kalilla 23:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The template looks fine for me and has a purpose. I think we should replace Template:Move with it? Ju ze User_Juze_sig_icon.jpg 05:31, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * If I may make a suggestion Juze, I made a template for verification as well as that is what I'm use to instead of just verify. So both Verify and Verification link to Category:Verify. So with Move and SpeedMove you can simply make both pages identical and have both tags work just the same and link them both to the same section Category:Article Move Requests.


 * They are two different tags, but they serve the same purpose it is just a different way for users to access those tags and what they like better. This doesn't split up the work for admins as they both route to the same thing. So I would say keep both, but make both work identical. -- ❤Kalilla❤ 07:12, 13 June 2011 (UTC)