Talk:Ocram

Only 5-10 I got eight then lost them somehow. Do it so it's 10-20
 * Sign your posts with ~.

We also don't make the game, leave your suggestions where they belong! On the forums.209.240.127.74 02:12, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

It states that in second form Ocram has double damage, though the boxes both say 65 damage, which ones wrong? I don't play mobile/console so I don't know, just caught that little discontinuity when looking around. TH3C4K3S (talk) 03:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I am really, really, really, damn sure that it doubles in the second form... It's mainly the second form that I die on. C74SS1F13D 06:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * With about 30 defense, Ocram dealt about 70 damage in its first form, and 130 damage in its second form. It seems like the page hasn't been updated to reflect its difficulty increase. --KM100 (talk) 16:23, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Soul of Blight drop amounts?
The data listed in the infobox is confusing:

It makes it look like there are three versions of this boss. I'm guessing the 5-16 is relevant to the console version, while 15-24 relates to the mobile version. What is the 25 for? --NibKing (talk) 03:48, 15 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I tested the drops from beating Ocram a handful of times on the mobile version, and I seemed to get about 24-30 Souls of Blight per battle. Unless the number 25 has some specific significance on the console version, it doesn't seem to mean anything. --KM100 (talk) 16:23, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I've seen other reports of 30 for mobile. I think it should be changed to | Soul of Blight|5-16, 15-30| 100% --NibKing (talk) 20:34, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Perhaps a console icon should be added there, for a bit more clarity. Otherwise, that seems fine. If the number 25 is revealed to be significant later, it can always be re-added. --KM100 (talk) 23:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Damage doubling
The text says that Ocram's damage doubles in the second form, but the upper boxes in the article say it deals 65 damage in both forms. 95.91.233.119 23:48, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Apparently this issue has been noted before and just went unchanged. We can't look at the mobile version source code to clarify (which may be why it wasn't updated) but I'll take multiple claims as a sufficient source in lieu of a better alternative. Gearzein (talk) 10:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)