Talk:Biomes

Format
In all environments pages there are these repetitive "inside the" and "found in the" etc., i think that should be deleted, not sure though --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bow Artist3 (talk &bull; contribs) at 13:18, May 23, 2011 (UTC).
 * I agree. Unless we eventually learn a lot more about the specific biomes, I'd say they all get merged here and redirected when searched for. MarekkPie 14:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Merge
A merge has recently been suggest for this page. I am against it, simply because it is too soon. I think we have to wait and give those pages a chance to be stand alone. Worst case scenario, we merge later. By merging too soon, we undermine the individual page's chance of becoming a full fledged article. Happypal 15:28, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I just want to add that I don't like this idea either - having long wordy articles with many many subcategories is fine for some things, but can also be extremely cluttered looking, especially if each section has screenshots and the like. And also, yes, the game is still very in development, lots of things are likely to be added quite soon for each section. --FungusTrooper 15:49, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * As I stated under meteorites, look a the Ore page along with the subsections for how I believe the Environments page should work, a small article with minor notes on the biomes then subpages for each environment. -Shadowclaimer 16:20, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not saying it would a merge would be the wrong solution, I'm just saying it is too soon for such a big change. Ore is just a block, and there is not much to say about it. An environment, on the other hand, I can see growing into great articles, with images and tons of things. If it turns out I'm wrong, then a merge would indeed be the right solution; merges are easy, un-merges are hard.
 * That said, I see nothing wrong with presenting the environment page like the ore one, with a little subsection and a link. Happypal 18:39, 23 May 2011 (UTC)