FANDOM


m (Nomination for Squazzil)
(Support: supprt)
Line 57: Line 57:
 
====Support====
 
====Support====
 
*I would like to nominate {{U|Squazzil}} as a new rollbacker here on the wiki. She has been both thorough and active for a considerable period of time (more so than myself at many points), regularly reverting edits that were either non-productive, unneeded or plain vandalous. She has been here and active on the wiki for nearly as long as myself, and I've seen the quality of her edits and her actions to help the community improve over that period. She's gone out of her way to contact me in regards to possible vandals and other rulebreakers and has done a fine job in her role as a Forum Moderator as well. I think she would do very well in this role. {{User:The_Pathogen/inlinesig|Mon 1 February 2016, 23:07}}
 
*I would like to nominate {{U|Squazzil}} as a new rollbacker here on the wiki. She has been both thorough and active for a considerable period of time (more so than myself at many points), regularly reverting edits that were either non-productive, unneeded or plain vandalous. She has been here and active on the wiki for nearly as long as myself, and I've seen the quality of her edits and her actions to help the community improve over that period. She's gone out of her way to contact me in regards to possible vandals and other rulebreakers and has done a fine job in her role as a Forum Moderator as well. I think she would do very well in this role. {{User:The_Pathogen/inlinesig|Mon 1 February 2016, 23:07}}
*...
+
*Path said essentially anything I'd have to say. To be brief, Squazzil is a dedicated user and a beacon of maturity and reason on the wiki. I see no reason why she shouldn't be promoted, and I would even go on to say that she should be nominated for administrator (more in comments). {{User:TerrariamcSwaggins/sig}} 02:09, February 2, 2016 (UTC)
  +
 
====Oppose====
 
====Oppose====
 
*...
 
*...

Revision as of 02:09, February 2, 2016

This page is for nominations and discussion of users to obtain user rights.

Instructions
Users will never be given any rights against their will. As a result, make sure the user you would like to nominate for a right knows about your intentions and is interested in the right in question!

Click the "Edit" button next to the right you would like to nominate a user for, then create a level three heading which contains the name of the user you would like to nominate.

  • Example: ===[[User:Example|Example]]===

When the above is done, copy the following code below the header you created in the above step:

====Support====
#'''...'''

====Oppose====
#'''...'''

====Neutral/Recuse====
#'''...'''

====Comments====
*...

It is common (but not required) that the nominator pre-fill the first point under the "Support" section with their reasoning for making the nomination/why they believe the nominee would do well in the role they were nominated for.

Bureaucrats

Summary
Bureaucrats are particularly trusted admins who have the extra capability to manage user rights. Bureaucrats are also responsible for resolving admin disputes. New bureaucrats may be nominated in this section.
For previous discussions, see the archive

Please make sure you understand what makes a good candidate for this right before nominating a user here. For convenience, a basic summary of this wiki's bureaucrat policy is provided to the right.

Administrators

Summary
Administrators are to serve leadership and maintenance roles on the wiki, and are to act in the best interests of the community. Despite their extra permissions, admins do not outrank other users. New administrators may be nominated in this section.
For previous discussions, see the archive

Please make sure you understand what makes a good candidate for this right before nominating a user here. For convenience, a basic summary of this wiki's admin policy is provided to the right.

Rollbackers

Summary
Rollback is a tool which allows for multiple consecutive edits by the same editor to be reverted in a single click. Users who possess this right on this wiki are identified by green usernames. Users can be nominated for this role in this section.
For previous discussions, see the archive

Please make sure you understand what makes a good candidate for this right before nominating a user here. For convenience, a basic summary of this wiki's rollback policy is provided to the right.

Squazzil

Support

  • I would like to nominate Squazzil as a new rollbacker here on the wiki. She has been both thorough and active for a considerable period of time (more so than myself at many points), regularly reverting edits that were either non-productive, unneeded or plain vandalous. She has been here and active on the wiki for nearly as long as myself, and I've seen the quality of her edits and her actions to help the community improve over that period. She's gone out of her way to contact me in regards to possible vandals and other rulebreakers and has done a fine job in her role as a Forum Moderator as well. I think she would do very well in this role. 2016_wikia_image_template.png  iPathos | Talk Page | Mon 1 February 2016, 23:07
  • Path said essentially anything I'd have to say. To be brief, Squazzil is a dedicated user and a beacon of maturity and reason on the wiki. I see no reason why she shouldn't be promoted, and I would even go on to say that she should be nominated for administrator (more in comments). ()~ Swaggins ~ (The Terrarian Bugle) ~ (Talk) ~() ~ 02:09, February 2, 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

  • ...

Neutral/Recuse

  • ...

Comments

  • ...

Forum Moderators

Summary
Forum moderators are users who have several additional abilities for use in the forums. Users with this right are responsible for maintenance and moderation on the forums, though they do not have the ability to restrict users from accessing the forums. Users may be nominated for this right in this section
For previous discussions, see the archive

Please make sure you understand what makes a good candidate for this right before nominating a user here. For convenience, a basic summary of this wiki's forum moderator guidelines is provided to the right.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.